Anglicans Online
 News
 Resources
 Basics
 Worldwide Anglicanism    Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Home News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia Canada England
New this Week News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion Europe Ireland Japan New Zealand
Awards, Staff Newspapers Online B The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Scotland USA Wales World
Search Official Publications B The Bible B B B B B
This page last updated 29 March 2004
Anglicans Online last updated 20 August 2000

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters.

We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to English orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.


Letters from 21 to 28 March 2004

If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

Whose ox is gored?

I THINK THAT THE IRREGULAR confirmations that went on in Ohio may bring to the fore an issue that has been largely unconsidered in the recent debates over blessings and sacraments in our denomination. This is the issue of appropriate pastoral care for those involved in the rites themselves. While I am sure that none of the candidates of last week's Confirmation Service were compelled to participate against their will, I wonder if they were adequately prepared for the fallout that has followed.

If the action of the Bishops was, in fact, in violation of Canon Law, then what does that say about the validity or acceptability of the Sacrament itself. Certainly we cannot undo, or take away, the Grace that the Spirit has already imparted to these men and women. Are they, therefore, simply left to live out the rest of their Christian life marked by the unfortunate decisons made unilaterally by a handful of opportunistic clergy?

If, as has been suggested by those who feel that the voice of the Church was not honestly represented at GC2003, there is a 'conservative correction' to the Church's policy on the blessing of same-sex relationships at the next General Convention, how will we faithfully minister to those who have taken advantage of the Church's interim 'exploration'. Will they too become the victims of Church politics that are far to ready to accept the democratic principles of majority rule, without first striving to reach the biblical idea of 'all being of the same mind?'

Arthur Callaham
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, USA
callaham@uchicago.edu
22 March 2004

Whose steak is fried?

A GREAT DEAL OF THE RECENT OUTCRY in the Episcopal Church has bemoaned the denominations's departure from two millenia of received Christian tradition. In that connection, I was bemused by Bishop Whalon's report of the Texas cuisine -- chili and chicken-fried steak -- that the bishops are consuming on their Lenten retreat down at Camp Allen. It seems that the bishops have collectively departed from 1,700 years of the Church's consistent teaching on Lenten discipline with nary a whimper of protest.

Warren T. Woodfin
St. Paul's K Street, Washington, DC
Princeton, New Jersey, USA
23 March 2004

You're welcome.

PLEASE DO NOT say 'hallo.'

Jim Flynt
St Jude's Church, Niceville, Florida, USA
28 March 2004

Goodness, we're grumpy in Niceville. Sorry, Jim, we've been saying hallo for getting on seven years and we plan to continue. Perhaps a little background will help: See our letter in May 2001 about the H word. And the following week for a bearish trend of support and a chance to choose the salutation.


Earlier letters

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All of our letters are in our archives.

Top


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact ao-editor@anglicansonline.org about information on this page. ©2007 Society of Archbishop Justus