Anglicans Online
 News
 Resources
 Basics
 Worldwide Anglicanism    Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Home News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia Canada England
New this Week News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion Europe Ireland Japan New Zealand
Awards, Staff Newspapers Online B The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Scotland USA Wales World
Search Official Publications B The Bible B B B B B
This page last updated 25 August 2004
Anglicans Online last updated 20 August 2000

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters.

We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to English orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.


Letters from 15 to 22 August 2004

If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

'Beset by a form of Spiritual Alzheimer's?'

'The biggest enemy of our church is not the threat of torture, but the promise of golf and brunch. We wouldn't be at all surprised if that were also true for most of us.'

Hmmm. What you say may be true of the Church in the West / North / developed world / industrialised world (use whichever you want); but 'for most of us'? The reality is otherwise in many parts of Africa and Asia, where the majority of Christians, indeed Anglicans, are to be found. There, the threat of persecution and attack is a horrific fact of life.

We Westerners may fear our Church sinking into irrelevance (I write as Westerner, but living and working in a part of the world where to be a practicing Christian can have serious, even life-threatening, consequences).

Ours, of course, is a Church that, socio-politically, has been around a long time and to many now seems worn down by cares and concerns that are not of immediate concern in parts of the world where the Church is younger and more dynamic.

We Westerners like to think that age has brought our branch of the Church wisdom and experience, and we tend to be somewhat patronising towards Christians in Africa, Asia and elsewhere with their, to us uncomfortable, certainties. 'They are young; they don't understand the problems we face; they are too rigid; the faith has moved on,' we say. Yes, youth is often impetuous, idealistic, and intolerant of the tolerance that comes with age, of the notion that there are few perfect answers. It sees that as hypocrisy, when it isn't. On the other hand, could it be that we ageing Western Christians are also beset by some spiritual form of Alzheimer's? Spiritual Alzheimer's. There's a thought -- except that if we've got it, we wouldn't know. That's the trouble with Alzheimer's.

Personally, I happily admit I don't know the answer. All answers to matters spiritual seem only to pose yet more questions. So all I have is questions if I delve deeply into such matters ... but questions sustained and eased by faith. Which is perhaps why I remain an Anglican and in in communion with those on both sides of the current divide, both of whom sometimes seem to be as intolerant as the other.

Michel Cousins,
somewhere in the Arabian peninsula, where there is no golf and brunch lasts all day.

Michael Cousins
Middle East
When in UK, St Mungo's, Alexandria, Dunbartonshire
m.s.cousins@dial.pipex.com
19 August 2004

The most of us in our letter was meant to refer to 'most of us reading Anglicans Online', not most of the Christians in the world. We apologise for the lack of clarity.

No via media here

TRY INTERFERING WITH GOLF and brunch and you'll find out just what persecution in the Church really is!

In one small mission church I served some time ago, people were offended when (their words) I insisted that children be allowed in church, and I invited disreputable people to church (they were referring to a homeless couple, some workers in the local Mexican restaurant, and a lesbian couple who ran a coffee shop in town.) They also objected to the parish hall being used as an after-school study hall one day a week, as they wanted it reserved for 'teas and receptions'; If only I had thought to have brunches and arrange golf matches, the congregation might have evolved. (Not sure into what!)

In no way do I wish to diminish the reality of persecutions Christians suffer every day, all over the world. But my goodness, we certainly are bad about persecuting one another.

The Reverend Peggy Blanchard
St Barnabas Episcopal, Jefferson City
Kingston, Tennessee, USA
revpeg@hotmail.com
17 August 2004

'Our greatest worry'

OUR GREATEST WORRY is fundamentalism. Our parish has hosted a refugee congregation of Christian Iraqis for over a year now. They tell of the mad fundamentalist Muslims in Iraq, how Saddam had given the Christians a measure of safety, and how that has all gone now.

Sadly, we also see now on the streets of New Zealand, children organised in black shirts to protest at the behest of the Destiny Church, taught to hate...

Gillian Lander
St John's Anglican Church, Northcote
Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
17 August 2004

Loving only certain kinds of neighbours

I JUST LOOKED AT the South Carolina news story about a separate Christian state. To me that would be a rerun of Puritan England or New England, both of which were pretty intolerant.

Also I suppose they would reintroduce slavery and a few other nasty concepts that have long been eliminated in other places. Women would be back in the home and as for gay couples, they would be either a dead or be fleeing out of South Carolina.

Now such a separate state is of course an idea -- but such an idea is grossly non-Christian. Do I love my neighbour ONLY when he attends the same church as I? I hope not.

Paul Willson
Anglican Church of Canada
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
21 August 2004

A worldwide church no longer possible?

GO BISHOP BRUNO! Your action to inhibit the breakaway Los Angles clergy represents the belief of the majority of Episcopal parishes and dioceses. I am quite tired of the African church, which apparently has many archbishops, bishops and 'members' -- but very few priests administering parishes -- taking control of the Anglican Communion.

As a child I remember giving money in my Easter mite box to help these third-world countries and to establish the Anglican church in that area. I find the attitude of these bishops beyond Anglican belief. If you do not agree with them, they want you thrown out of the communion. Not to mention their willingness to invade any diocese that happens to be unhappy with its bishop.

I now believe it is time for the Episcopal Church to stand alone and not be impeded by these African and Asian countries, which will take a few more generations to enter the modern world. We live in a country where we elect our bishops and parish rectors. Separation of church and state is the rock this country is founded upon. The Anglican Communion has always held together because of our ability to respect each other's opinions, even if we did not agree with them. It is a sad day for our communion.

I no longer believe that a 'Worldwide Church' is possible.

Carl D. Bell
Los Altos, California, USA
22 August 2004


Earlier letters

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All of our letters are in our archives.

Top


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact ao-editor@anglicansonline.org about information on this page. ©2007 Society of Archbishop Justus