Anglicans Online
 News
 Resources
 Basics
 Worldwide Anglicanism    Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Home News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia Canada England
New this Week News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion Europe Ireland Japan New Zealand
Awards, Staff Newspapers Online B The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Scotland USA Wales World
Search Official Publications B The Bible B B B B B
This page last updated 18 January 2006
Anglicans Online last updated 20 August 2000

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters.

We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to English orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.


Letters from 9 to 15 January 2006

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters are the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

It's not life, it's television

Can we please have some comment (and action) on the awful presentation of Christian living portrayed on the premiere of "The Book of Daniel?" I was hoping the show would be more along the lines of "Joan of Arcadia," but it was far too inappropriate in too many ways to even list here.

There was so much to be learned from the way the family learned to accept the gay son -- instead of holding him up to mean-spirited ridicule from family members.

The Bishop's wife could have been depicted as senile without using the graphic words. The shock value of their exchange as they were going to the car was enough to show her illness extremes without being inappropriate for viewers.

Dysfunction in a family can be depicted in a way to help people deal with their own problems, but everything about this show was mean-spirited and not funny.

I will not give this show a second chance, although I had great hopes for it.

Ruth Anne Harris
Grace Episcopal Church
Fairfield, California, USA
9 January 2006

(Ed: for those of you who live outside the USA, the US's NBC Universal network has launched a television soap opera programme 'The Book of Daniel' whose protagonist is an Episcopal Priest. The programme is not universally admired.)

Don't forget the Book of Daniel

How quickly we forget some of the steps along the long journey that — through time and place — have delivered the sacred manuscripts, clergy and sacraments to our day.

Part of that journey includes archaeological evidence for: a woman priest (in a fresco in the Catacombs of Priscilla, Rome); a woman bishop (in a mosaic at St. Praxedis, Rome) and even some evidence of church rites for same-sex blessings across mediæval Europe.

The conservative/liberal divide of modern Anglicanism is hardly a new one either. For according to the first Book of Common Prayer:

‘And whereas in this our tyme, the myndes of menne bee so diuerse, that some thynke it a greate matter of conscience to departe from a peece of the leaste of theyr Ceremonies (they bee so addicted to their olde customes), and agayne on the other side, some bee so newe fangle that they woulde innouate all thing, and so doe despise the olde that nothing canne lyke them, but that is newe: It was thought expediente not so muche to haue respecte howe to please and satisfie eyther of these parties, as howe to please God, and profitte them bothe' (BCP 1549)

Martin Murray
St. John's Cathedral
Hong Kong Island, HKSAR
martinmurrayeducation@hotmail.com
10 January 2006


Earlier letters

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All of our letters are in our archives.

Top


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact ao-editor@anglicansonline.org about information on this page. ©2007 Society of Archbishop Justus