Anglicans Online
 News
 Resources
 Basics
 Worldwide Anglicanism    Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Home News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia Canada England
New this Week News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion Europe Ireland Japan New Zealand
Awards, Staff Newspapers Online B The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Scotland USA Wales World
Search Official Publications B The Bible B B B B B
This page last updated 4 February 2006
Anglicans Online last updated 20 August 2000

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters.

We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to English orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.


Letters from 23 to 29 January 2006

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters are the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

So little dialogue, so many opportunities

When I joined the church as an undergraduate I was appalled by the disconnect between my college philosophy and theology courses and my “adult confirmation class” at church. In theology class we read the Fathers and doped out the details of the Christological controversies; in confirmation class we got sentimental drivel. In philosophy class we asked whether postmortem survival was logically possible; in confirmation class we learnt it wasn’t—and the priest glossed “the resurrection of dead and the life of the world to come” as “not pie in the sky when you die but life in depth and fullness here and now.” My adult life in the church was more of the same. The sermons I heard and adult education events I attended had no connection to the literature or the ongoing discussion of the issues in philosophy of religion and ethics that I studied and taught: in church, it seemed, I and other educated adults were supposed to suspend disbelief and accept the intellectual leadership of clergy who were living in a parallel universe.

I’m not sure how things got this way—why there is so little dialogue between laypeople and clergy in the church engaged with theological and ethical issues and academics who address the same concerns. As a member of the Society of Christian Philosophers, an organization which is not restricted to professional philosophers but welcomes membership from all who consider themselves Christians and wish to engage in critical reflection on their Christian commitment, I have tried to promote conversation between those of us engaged in this reflection in the academy, the church and the wider community. On February 16 – 18, the philosophy department at my university is sponsoring the regional conference of the Society of Christian Philosophers, Selves, Souls and Survival. The conference is open to everyone and information about the event, including links to most of the papers, is at the conference website. In addition to sessions on the conference theme, the nature of personhood and the possibility of post-mortem survival, the conference will include Saturday morning sessions that will be of special interest to the general public on the tension between secular and religious law, abortion, and the current controversy concerning evolution, intelligent design and creationism.

H. E. Baber
University of San Diego
San Diego, California, USA
baber@sandiego.edu
23 January 2006

Modern heresies

Through the years I have learned that our world has many sects, perhaps heretical, perhaps not even Christian. Once in Western Canada some Dhoukobors came to visit us internees, selling us chicken meat and eggs. They had religious convictions which forbade them from eating meat but they had no hesitation in selling such produce to us. Besides that they were conscientious objectors and among them were some extremists who called themselves the “Sons of Freedom”. It was, to my mind, riddled with sensationalism, but they were kindly people, distributing food we needed.

When we moved to Southern Alberta after the end of WW II, we met other conscientious objectors, Mennonites (followers of Menno Simons) who had emigrated to parts of Canada and the United States to flee from religious persecution and avoid military conscription in Europe. It was an irony to discover that many of their descendants, as a mark of patriotism, had signed up for military service during WW II!

We discovered Mormons, a religious group who called themselves “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints”. It was curious to discover that they were a kind of North American indigenous believers who followed of teachings recorded by Joseph Smith. Their "stakes" were similar to our diocesan structures. Brigham Young had led pilgrims across the USA to Utah, and in turn a group had come to settle in Southern Alberta. Besides alcoholic beverages, they forbade coffee and tea as “strong drink”, used a Westcott & Hort Anglican Bible, and followed additional scriptures of their own called “The Book of Mormon”. They denied belief in the holy Trinity, and their experiences of the rigors of life on the frontier encouraged them to believe in a human Jesus more than a divine one. Such accretions to the traditional Canon of Scripture put them beyond the pale of orthodox Christianity, indeed, some would call them anti-Christian.

We discovered another group. Periodically we would be visited by people who came in pairs, who would knock on our door to distribute newsprint pamphlets, brochures and books published by the “Watchtower and Bible Tract Society”, sharing their warnings of doom and telling about their faith promulgated by Pastor Russell and Judge Rutherford. I learned that this sect began when they were forbidden to have any assemblies, and had changed their name several times. At one time they were known as “Millenial Dawnists”. Today they meet in “Kingdom Halls”, meet on Saturdays and visiting people on Sundays to promote their doctrines as “Witnesses of Jehovah”, forbidding their members from “eating blood”, obeying dietary rules based on the interpretations of the Old Testament, and decrying the observance of any day as more important than another, except the Sabbath. Thus they disapprove of such observances as Christmas, Good Friday, or Easter.

My father, a missionary Priest of the Missionary Society of the Church of England in Canada, serving in the Diocese of Calgary, was hard-pressed to educate the newly converted Anglican Christian Japanese Canadians about the proliferation of these various religious movements, explaining these things in Japanese as well as in English. At one point among many self-published books, he produced one in Japanese about heresies exposed.

As I get on in years I feel some nostalgia for the days when the exclusive claims of Christ seemed clearer. Inclusive understandings may seem more profound, and are more congenial in our time. The all-inclusive love of God, welcoming us, and inviting us to welcome others in turn, is so important in our fractured, polarized, and divided world. My confession of faith compels me to acknowledge that my faith in God has been made known in Jesus the Christ, the Messiah of God, in the presence of the uniting power of the Holy Spirit. May we be united by God and in God. Amen.

The Reverend Timothy Makoto Nakayama
St. Mark's Cathedral, Seattle
Seattle, Washington, USA
frtim@yahoo.com
23 January 2006


Earlier letters

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All of our letters are in our archives.

Top


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact ao-editor@anglicansonline.org about information on this page. ©2007 Society of Archbishop Justus