Letters from 9
to 15 February 2009
Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters are the opinions
of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with
them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.
All true,
but whatever can be done about it?
Thanks
very much for
your spot-on comments about the various officeholders who affect the
life of a parish, and, particularly, for your reference to Walter Mitty,
which will do much, I think, to help me put things in perspective in
the future! As a parish rector, I have found that people who feel frustrated
or undervalued in their life outside the church are likely to use the
congregation as an arena for seeking and exercising power.
The difference
between a church and a corporation, however, is that, in the great
majority of instances, the officers are not employees, but volunteers.
A priest can't fire a parish officer any more than family members can
fire one of their siblings. No matter how frustratingly poor the person's
performance might be, asking an officeholder to step down is simply
not an option for a rector, unless that rector is willing to face the
enormous upheaval in which that action is likely to result. Corporate
CEO's are beholden to customers and stockholders. The situation is
much less clear-cut for a parish priest.
This goes
both ways, of course. The congregation which is frustrated by a rector
who is a "poor manager" doesn't simply fire its priest, but must embark
upon an often painful process, involving the bishop, whereby the pastoral
relationship is dissolved.
The Church
is a sacred mystery; the corporation isn't. That we are living in the
midst of that mystery is - to use a phrase familiar to Anglicans -
both our greatest strength and our greatest weakness.
The Reverend William
Bippus
St. Paul's Church
Marinette, Wisconsin, USA
13 February 2009
Can you help
us in Port of Spain?
Do you have
any information on implementation of Occupational Health and Safety measures
in the Anglican Church? In Trinidad and Tobago, the law was passed for
OSHA, and the Anglican Church has been asked to implement same.
Carol Trotman
The Holy Trinity Cathedral
Port of Spain, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
10 February 2009
(Ed: We hope
that our readers may know something that will help you; we'll relay any
information sent to editor@anglicansonline.org. We suspect that OSHA
implementation is unlikely to be different in a church. After all, OSHA
rules are about workplace safety in the physical world, and that physical
world does not change much from one office environment to another.)
But does
God keep two sets of books?
According
to a report in
The Guardian (Monday
2 February 2009) Pope Benedict has
promoted to auxiliary bishop in Linz, Austria, the Rev. Gerard Maria
Wagner, an ultra-conservative Austrian clergyman who called Hurricane
Katrina "God's punishment". He wrote that Hurricane Katrina was an act
of "divine retribution" for the sins of a sexually permissive society,
and that it was worth considering whether environmental catastrophes
should not be seen as a result of "spiritual environmental pollution" —
a type of "divine retribution" for New Orleans' relaxed attitude towards
sexual promiscuity and homosexuality.
Given the
attention paid by the media to divisions within the Anglican Communion
over matters of sexuality, it is no doubt tempting to welcome focus on
this sad example of ecclesiastical stupidity; but it is a temptation
that ought to be resisted.
The notion
of God as a divine accountant who keeps book on evil, and then visits
indiscriminate wrath on entire populations, is unfortunately as alive
and flourishing in the USA as in Linz. Bishop Gerhard Maria
Wagner may be an idiot, but he is neither unique in his "reasoning" nor
alone in his vindictiveness.
David Fisher
St James Cathedral
Naperville, IL USA
dhfisher@noctrl.edu
15 February 2009
(Ed: Father
Wagner's appointment proved unpopular in Austria and it seems that he
has asked the pope to take back his promotion).
Earlier letters
We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our
archives.
|