Curdmudgeon
here, in
response to your
happy story about the covenant relationship Anglicans
and Methodists have established in New Zealand. I'm all for intercommunion
but I don't believe that any legitimate purpose is served by the time,
energy and money denominational bureaucrats spend putting together
such covenant relationships or promoting ecumenism.
Officially, any baptized person
is welcome to receive communion in any Anglican Church, as I understand it, and unofficially,
so is anyone whether baptized or unbaptized, regardless of their theological commitments
of lack thereof. I'm all for this. Moreover, as a baptized Episcopalian I am, as I understand
it, welcome to participate in the services of most non-RC, non-Orthodox churches and receive
communion. So how, pray, do these ecumenical efforts with fellow-Protestants benefit me,
or any other ordinary layperson, in any way?
Now if there were
prospects for intercommunion with Catholics or Orthodox, that would make
a difference because I am not welcome
to receive communion in Catholic or Orthodox churches. But that is not going
to happen. Where we need intercommunion we aren't going to get it. Intra-Protestant
ecumenical efforts not only yield no benefits — they're potentially costly
since ecumenical enthusiasts almost always promote liturgical uniformity
which restricts individual choice. I like ultra-high-churchiness in the
Anglican style. I enjoy the smells and bells but I don't just want a simulacrum
of Tridentine Roman Catholicism — I want lots of deep Sarum bowing, Anglican
chant, jolly hymns and the liturgical year starting at Trinity Sunday
rather than Whitsunday (a.k.a. "Pentecost").
I
want to enjoy myself. But I can also understand people liking completely different liturgies,
and would like to have the opportunity to experience them too. Everybody should get what
they want and enjoy themselves. Lutherans should sing Bach Chorales. Calvinists should put
the pulpit at the center of their churches and attend to preaching. Holy Rollers should roll
in the aisles. I would like to be able to go to churches in those traditions and enjoy their
distinctive practices whenever I feel like it for variety and for additional enjoyment. We
don't belong to "denominations" and shouldn't, I believe, regard ourselves primarily as members
of "congregations." We're members of the Church.
Church membership
doesn't make us members of "communities" or, in the current smarmy phrase, "church
families." It entitles us to participate
in liturgy — it is a communion ticket. We should be able to go to any church
of any "denomination" and
participate, in the same way that we can go to any supermarket, of any chain,
and shop. We already, in effect, have communion tickets for any Protestant
church we care to visit so what is the point of these ecumenical efforts?
H. E. Baber
University of San Diego
San Diego, California, USA
baber@sandiego.edu
8 June 2009
Please find the direct web
link to our denomination, it was listed until recently on your listings
but is not there now? We are part of the Anglican Independent Communion
Worldwide & wish to be listed. I personally
am a member of the American Anglican Council (joined in 2003 as a priest) & have
until recently received your newsletter, which I have enjoyed. Thank you for
including us in your listings.
Archbishop Dr. Peter McInnes
Primate, Anglican Independent Communion Australia
Capalaba BC, Queensland, AUSTRALIA
12 June 2009
(Editor: Please use this form to submit a site for inclusion in our resource listings. We weren't aware that we had a newsletter,
and we don't remember ever sending one out. Could you be so kind as to forward one back to
us for our archives?)