Anglicans Online
 News
 Resources
 Basics
 Worldwide Anglicanism    Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Home News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia Canada England
New this Week News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion Europe Ireland Japan New Zealand
Awards, Staff Newspapers Online B The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Scotland USA Wales World
Search Official Publications B The Bible B B B B B
This page last updated 2 March 2011
Anglicans Online last updated 20 August 2000

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters. We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to Canadian orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.

Letters from 21 to 27 February 2011

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters express the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

Horizontal rule

Pizza to Lambeth Palace?

it certainly seems to be more gracious to serve and share pizza than to argue about who has the right to consecrate, serve and share bread and wine, and who gets to come to the table to eat it. And who gets to punish those who do it 'wrong'.

Both the Covenant 'situation' and the situation in Wisconsin are probably a lot more complicated than that. Or maybe not.

Michelle C. Jackson
Trinity Cathedral, Sacramento
Elk Grove, California, USA
astraeus@accessbee.com
21 February 2011

Study, study, study . . . then: poof!

Thank you for the editorial of 21 February! I have always felt it a strength of Anglicanism that we have no litmus test for anything. It is enough to hold out hands, receive, and say "amen". That I might disagree with those to my literal and figurative right and left has nothing to do with their acceptance by God as He is manifest.

But now specifically regarding the covenant, maybe we can do the usual Anglican thing: study it for a trinity of decades like we do everything else, such that its potency and relevance vanishes?

W J Arnold PhD
St Mark's Church
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, CANADA
22 February 2011

As important as it gets

Dear friends,

It must be very important for you to break your policy of not taking sides. You did well — concise, even-handed, factual, reasoned. Thank you.

Lois Keen
Grace Episcopal Church, Norwalk, Connecticut
Norwalk, Connecticut, USA
22 February 2011

Horizontal rule
Earlier letters

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our archives.

Top


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact <a href="mailto:ao-editor@AnglicansOnline.org">ao-editor@anglicansonline.org</a> about information on this page. ©2000 Society of Archbishop Justus