![]() |
|
|
|
Hallo again to all.
What is to be done with all the numbers? Generally—and because the trends of participation and membership are not encouraging in the places that keep them best—awareness of the numbers often ends in handwringing rather than constructive thought. There is what turns out to be a problem with finding the right sap to nourish the tree. The Washington Post ran a headline this week to the effect that 'If it doesn’t stem its decline, mainline [American] Protestantism has just 23 Easters left,' noting that 'While the sky isn’t falling, the floor is dropping out' in progressive Christian traditions. The Church Times wrote on the same day on this wise: 'Death of cathedrals: reports have been exaggerated' (in homage to Mark Twain) after a report that as many as half of English cathedrals need to be closed. The American Conservative looks at the numbers and asks 'Has the Last Episcopalian Been Born?' Still elsewhere, British Religion in Numbers looks more broadly at religious engagement in Britain, situating Anglicans in comparison with their neighbours and tending to an eirenic, scholarly application of information. There are a handful of problems with the ways in which the numbers are reported. They are geographically and linguistically myopic in a way that Christianity has never been. Rumours of the End of the Church—or a church—are almost always about Anglophone or Eurocentric situations, ignoring the life of the wider Church in the Portuguese-speaking world, in the wider Sinosphere, in failing to be aware of the historical trends of church life before c. 1940*. They also often do not take into account the hybridity of belonging in ecumenical situations where Anglicans live in local, national, or international partnerships with Lutherans, Reformed Christians, Moravians, inheritors of the Wesleyan tradition, among others. And because Christianity is a religion of the Spirit as well as of the tactile, head-count-able flesh, patterns of belief and belonging will always have elements that cannot be measured on spreadsheets and parochial reports. More to the point, the handwringing about numbers is rooted from what Bishop Richard Chartres of London has called a 'problem-led' rather than a 'vision-led' approach to Church life. Rather than singing 'change and decay all around I see,' the now-retired bishop presided over a period of what he describes as 'a lively debate about church planting strategy' in which parish electoral rolls grew by some 2.5% a year during the latter part of his tenure in contrast to the larger patterns of attrition. In addition to making structural changes and collaborations with professional church planters, the bishop realised that 'Growth springs from movements of the Holy Spirit, and from communities and individuals in whom there is life-giving sap.' The numbers, stark as they are, remind us that sap has two meanings in English: the undermining of someone's strength or some thing's integrity, and the wonderful fluid that carries water and nutrition throughout a plant. With all the knowledge we now have about sapping of the one kind, it behoves the Church in places where there is a desire for growth to find and encourage the other kind of sap. We have a good God's promise of guidance in discerning how to find it if our hearts are open and our minds will learn. See you next week.
Richard Mammana | ||
![]() This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact editor@anglicansonline.org about information on this page. ©2017 Society of Archbishop Justus. Please address all spam to press@anglicansonline.org |