Anglicans Online News Resources Basics Worldwide Anglicanism Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Noted Recently News Centre A to Z Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia BIPS Canada
Letters to AO News Archives Events Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion England Europe Hong Kong Ireland
Search, Archives Newspapers Online Vacancies The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Japan New Zealand Nigeria Scotland
Visit the AO Shop Official Publications B The Bible B South Africa USA Wales WorldB
Help support AO w w w w w w w w
This page last updated 15 January 2018
Anglicans Online last updated 17 February 2019

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters. We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to Canadian orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.

Letters from the week of 8 - 14 January 2017

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters express the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

There are often comments about our front-page letters on the Anglicans Online Facebook page. You might like to have a look.

A House of Prayer?

Your editorial of January 7, 2018 on church tourism leads me to an interesting observation from a family holiday to Great Britain this past summer. There is a move afoot to encourage all churches - especially those in the C of E - to remain open for tourism, prayer, shelter, quite, a time of reflection or to investigate faith. In speaking with a Church Warden at a parish in Keswick, Cumbria I was delighted to learn that churches are endeavouring to be open during the week and for volunteers to be on-site to meet and greet.

While I understand that it is not always possible to have a volunteer available for every time slot in every church, the very notion of churches being open beyond Sunday worship brings joy to my heart. Be it the wandering pilgrim or the homeless - the church should be a place of welcome, comfort and security.

As a pilgrim who takes interest in visiting isolated village churches in North Wales as much as grand basilicas in London, I am taken aback when I am expected to pony up 10 pounds or more to visit a Cathedral. Even amid Canterbury's layers of scaffolding, there is an expectation that tourist or pilgrim alike pay on entry. As a church fundraiser I am neither naïve or unsympathetic to the financial burdens facing churches today. Declining parish rolls - and sometimes increasingly stingy donors - make for challenging times. Day to day costs have increased while maintenance is routinely deferred. It is not easy.

Still it seems to me that we would fair a lot better if we encourage free-will giving or sought out sponsorship to allow for the free visitation of pilgrims. On one hand we encourage churches to remain open and then on the other we try to squeeze as many shekels as possible from history buffs. There is a contradiction here.

Fortunately there is not a tax on prayer even if there is a tax on access (though I suppose some enterprising capitalist has thought of this). The fee for entry will not prevent my visitation (I'm sure parish treasurers sleep better knowing that) but I wrestle with having to pay to visit a house of prayer. I know Rome does it as much as Canterbury. It just doesn't sit well with me.

Peter Misiaszek
Anglican Diocese of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
9 January 2018

Several years ago we had the worst Christmas Eve service ever at Washington National Cathedral. The service itself was great and beautiful, but we were surrounded by tourists barely masked as worshippers. Hardly anyone around us participated, and we got strange looks and stares because we were participating in worship. It was the weirdest experience I've ever had. Felt like I was in a zoo - "Ohhh look at the Episcopalian in its native habitat." There might have even been some pictures taken of us worshipping.

Ashley Maddison
Holy Trinity, Wenonah, New Jersey, USA
9 January 2018

Many years ago I attended the Good Friday liturgy at the Washington Cathedral. The cathedral was inundated with tourists who chose the most inopportune times to move about the cathedral as a group. Had this been almost any other occasion, their presence would not have seemed quite so intrusive. I wrote the powers that be to complain and received the response that the tourists could not be controlled! I leave the interpretation of that to your readers.

Fr. Carlton Kelley
St. John's, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania USA
9 January 2018

A friend and I decided to have a half an hours prayer in a chapel in Guildford Cathedral. We nearly got thrown out because a guide thought we were up to no good, staying in a chapel so long!

Juliana SI
St Mary Magdalene's
Adelaide South Australia
8 January 2018


We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our archives.


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact <a href=""></a> about information on this page. ©2000 Society of Archbishop Justus