Anglicans Online News Basics Worldwide Anglicanism Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Noted Recently News Archives Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia BIPS Canada
Search, Archives Official Publications Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion England Europe Hong Kong Ireland
Resource directory   The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Japan New Zealand Nigeria Scotland
    The Bible B South Africa USA Wales WorldB
This page last updated 27 August 2018  

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters. We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to Canadian orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.

Letters from the week of 20 - 26 August 2018

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters express the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

There are often comments about our front-page letters on the Anglicans Online Facebook page. You might like to have a look.

Sale of Tasmanian Churches

Some reply is needed regarding the proposed sale of many Tasmanian churches, so many of them beautiful and historic. It would be a tragedy for our Church in that lovely island if the plans of the Bishop and his Synod come to pass. The money needed for recompense of those abused should not come from such sales—but from assessments especially on the wealthier parishes—not by taking from the poor what little they have—and by other means. As stated, that is only one quarter of what Bp Condie wants, and this payment should be kept quite separate from any idea of selling churches supposedly to support mission in the Diocese.

The churches are important for their communities, however small, and valued by many Anglicans who are not regular church-goers and also by those who value local history and heritage. They include the majority of Anglicans who would not agree with the extremely conservative theology one can read on the diocesan web-site, concepts which would dismay so many of the bishops and priests who have faithfully served the Diocese in the past, nor with the rejection of those attending rarely or at all or believing the wrong things as not true Anglicans or true Christians.

I think of fine church folk I have known in Tasmania, such as Bishop Bob Davies or Canon John May (POW in Japan in the War) let alone those about whom I have read such as Bishop Montgomery and his wife. I have seen the majority of parishes in my Sydney Diocese (in which I was baptised 82 years ago) move further and further away from anything recognisably Anglican—becoming neo-puritan, congregational, contemptuous of liberals—and of the US Episcopal Church in particular, and sadly so generally intolerant.

Its Synod now overwhelmingly represents one party (at this year's elections, only two minor positions were even contested), and I know from my long experience both as a rector in the Diocese and for 20 years as an honorary chaplain, how so many of our churches have few links with the local community—and at least in my hospital, virtually none at all. It has planted churches without permission in other dioceses and has successfully taken some over, and the great numbers of deacons ordained (allowed to celebrate the often increasingly less frequent Communion services) means that Sydney's representation in our General Synod continues to increase.

Sadly in some of these respects, Tasmania is even worse than Sydney. This is not a personal attack on the Bishop of Tasmania nor any of his followers nor his Synod members, but it does reflect the despair and impotence so many good church-people feel, in Sydney, Tasmania, and beyond in the Church of Australia. At least, I have just been blessed by probably the last of my many visits to the US and to its Episcopal Church. I am aware it is not free of faults but I came back back renewed, refreshed, and inspired —not least by my stays with the Community of St Francis in San Francisco and the Order of the Holy Cross in Santa Barbara and— giving it a special plug, the Julian of Norwich cottage to which I was welcomed in the grounds of All Saints', Carmel (plus attending a great Hymn Society conference in St Louis and enjoying the wonders of God's world as I travelled by Amtrak from San Francisco to Denver). As usual, I go on and on, but as Tiny Tim says, God bless us, everyone.

The Revd Dr John Bunyan
St John's, Canberra, St Stephen's Uniting, Sydney, King's Chapel, Bost
Campbelltown, New South Wales, Australia
20 August 2018

Abuse is a Crime

Whether it happens in Anglican, Catholic or any other church, the sexual abuse of children should be treated for what it is, a crime. The first response should be to call not church authorities but the police. Every time. Without exception. No church studies or hearings or other processes. I am still baffled why this isn’t done.

Mark Siegel
Cathedral of St. Philip Atlanta, Georgia, USA
21 August 2018


We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our archives.

This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact <a href=""></a> about information on this page. ©2000 Society of Archbishop Justus