Anglicans Online News Basics Worldwide Anglicanism Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Noted Recently News Archives Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia BIPS Canada
Search, Archives Official Publications Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion England Europe Hong Kong Ireland
Resource directory   The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Japan New Zealand Nigeria Scotland
    The Bible B South Africa USA Wales WorldB
This page last updated 15 October 2018  

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters. We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to Canadian orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.

Letters from the week of 8-14 October 2018

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters express the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

There are often comments about our front-page letters on the Anglicans Online Facebook page. You might like to have a look.

Thoughts about re-purposing old church buildings

While I have never been part of a congregation in any of the situations you describe (7 October 2018), being forced for whatever reason to worship outside the walls of beloved and consecrated church buildings, I have experienced another aspect of the building issue in two congregations: being in buildings which become the focus rather than God whom we are supposed to worship. How many congregations pour money and energy into staying in buildings with beloved history that no longer are truly appropriate for the smaller congregation or for the neighborhood that has changed around it or for countless other reasons? When it is the building that takes all our energy and focus rather than the worship of God and mission to those around us, we edge on idolatry. Yes, I love grand worship, the majestic sound of a well-played organ, a full, well trained choir, servers who know and love what they are doing, a full congregation singing traditional hymns with vigor - the whole panoply of Anglican worship at its best. Yet the reality is that many congregations now have the privileged opportunity of looking beyond what is no longer possible to ask where God might be leading. That requires the painful work of becoming willing to let go of some of our beloved buildings in order to discover ways of adapting our worship and expanding our spiritual growth and mission. Jesus didn't say "Come unto me, ye that are passionate about Gothic-style buildings and a single version of flawless worship." In fact he warned his disciples who were in awe of the glories of the Temple that no stone would be left on another. That happened, and our Jewish cousins found new and life-giving ways to worship and pass on their faith.

I also wonder how some of our grand old buildings might be re-purposed to enable more love, more outreach, more worship offered with wonder and joy to those who feel isolated from ancient grandeur, yet are starving for the message behind the grandeur. I wonder if letting go of some of the buildings of the past might be a way to jump-start ministries that are needed now, worship that is needed now. The Book of Common prayer in its many incarnations is wonderfully flexible and can carry the Anglican/Episcopal/Christian traditions of worship into many settings.

In the interest of full disclosure, severe allergic reactions to something in the air there keep me from joining my Community in worship in our lovely old Chapel. I can only worship with my Sisters when we stay in our simpler Oratory in the Convent. It is conceivable that this experience of isolation colors my opinions, although I also have the history described above of being in other congregations where building worship rather than worshipping God in a building became the order of the day. I also know of and have rejoiced with congregations who have found new uses for their buildings, new ways of worshipping, and have freed themselves from the tyranny of the past in order to worship God in the present. So now you know my biases and can judge my letter appropriately. Shalom to all.

Sister Diana Doncaster
Community of the Transfiguration
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
8 October 2018

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our archives.


This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact <a href="mailto:editor@AnglicansOnline.org">editor@anglicansonline.org</a> about information on this page. ©2000 Society of Archbishop Justus