Anglicans Online News Basics Worldwide Anglicanism Anglican Dioceses and Parishes
Noted Recently News Archives Start Here The Anglican Communion Africa Australia BIPS Canada
Search, Archives Official Publications Anglicans Believe... In Full Communion England Europe Hong Kong Ireland
Resource directory   The Prayer Book Not in the Communion Japan New Zealand Nigeria Scotland
    The Bible B South Africa USA Wales WorldB
This page last updated 4 March 2019  

Letters to AO

EVERY WEEK WE PUBLISH a selection of letters we receive in response to something you've read at Anglicans Online. Stop by and have a look at what other AO readers are thinking.

Alas, we cannot publish every letter we receive. And we won't publish letters that are anonymous, hateful, illiterate, or otherwise in our judgment do not benefit the readers of Anglicans Online. We usually do not publish letters written in response to other letters. We edit letters to conform with standard AO house style for punctuation, but we do not change, for example, American spelling to conform to British orthography. On occasion we'll gently edit letters that are too verbose in their original form. Email addresses are included when the authors give permission to do so.

If you'd like to respond to a letter whose author does not list an email, you can send your response to Anglicans Online and we'll forward it to the writer.

Letters from the week of 25 February - 3 March 2019

Like all letters to the editor everywhere, these letters express the opinions of the writers and not Anglicans Online. We publish letters that we think will be of interest to our readers, whether we agree with them or not. If you'd like to write a letter of your own, click here.

There are often comments about our front-page letters on the Anglicans Online Facebook page. You might like to have a look.

Including Inclusion

Thank you for you editorial challenging the common cited word "inclusion" as being one that is only given lip service in the Anglican Church.

As a priest in the Diocese of Toronto who rejoiced when Bishop Kevin Robertson was elected as a suffragan Bishop I was stunned by the announcement that his lifelong life partner—his spouse—would not be invited to Lambeth 2020. What a shallow and inappropriate action. As was mentioned, the comments by the President of the House of Deputies of the US Episcopal Church were on the mark. How can one defend the definition of marriage when many of the Bishops attending have been remarried? So much for a life-long commitment between a man and an women. Under the cloak of a "gay agenda" traditionalists are rallying to uphold, what at its best, is a broken tradition.

If I hear one more conservative christian speak about such inclusion being part of the "gay agenda" I will lose my mind. Far from a gay agenda to include same-sex relationships on a equal standing with heterosexual relationships, inclusion is a human issue. Equity based on our common humanity. Inclusion simply because we are unique and human. I am unsure where the Archbishop of Canterbury is on the issue of changing the marriage canon to allow for same-sex marriages. If he is remaining neutral just for the sake of keeping the Anglican Communion together there seems little that will appease GAFCON other than returning to patriarchy and power. For the record I am a heterosexual male who has been married to the same partner for close to 40 years. I support widening the canon to include the solemnization of two committed persons to a monogamous—exclusive life relationship.

The Rev. Donald Shields
St. Thomas Brooklin (Whitby)
Whitby, ON, Canada
planet.shields@gmail.com
25 February 2019

We launched our 'Letters to AO' section on 11 May 2003. All published letters are in our archives.

 

This web site is independent. It is not official in any way. Our editorial staff is private and unaffiliated. Please contact <a href="mailto:editor@AnglicansOnline.org">editor@anglicansonline.org</a> about information on this page. ©2000 Society of Archbishop Justus